Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159922 (ALL)

SMT. SATYAWATI DEVI v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, BABAGANJ, TEHSIL KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/5055/2025 · 2025-08-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5055 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, to decide Mutation Case No. 696 (now numbered as RST/06189/2017 (Computerized Case No. T 201702570106189) - Smt. Satyawati Vs. Smt. Rajwanti, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil - Kunda, District - Pratapgarh, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. 696 (now numbered as RST/06189/2017 (Computerized Case No. T 201702570106189) - Smt. Satyawati Vs. Smt. Rajwanti, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Ambuj Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Satyawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar, Babaganj, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench