RANJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7047/2025 · 2025-08-27
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159893 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7047 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the material brought on record.
2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash/set aside the cognizance/summoning order dated 13-09-2011 passed by the Learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh as well as N.B.W. dated 12- 12- 2024 issued by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh, in Complaint Case No. 2076 of 2000, U/S-147, 323, 504, 506, 324, 452, 427 I.P.C. Police Station-Antu, District- Pratapgarh, against the petitioner, which is contained as Annexure No.1 & 2 to this petition, in the interest of justice.."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. August 27, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ranjeet Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench