Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15989 (RAJ)

MUNSHIRAM SON OF SHRI DANARAM MEGHVANSHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2305/2025 · 2025-05-05

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18926] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2305/2025 Munshiram Son Of Shri Danaram Meghvanshi, Resident Of Ward No. 40, Global Coaching Center Ke Pass, Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Mahaveer Prasad Son Of Jivan Ram, Resident Of Village Dugoli, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Toofan Singh, ASI, Kotwali, Sikar Mr. Pankaj Gupta for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/05/2025 The present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No. 125/2025 dated 01.04.2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the impugned FIR no specific role/ allegation is assigned qua the petitioner. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the petitioner. Further, it is submitted that cross-complaint in the instant matter is also filed. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that in an organized manner, one Kailash and Munshi Ram hand- in- glove with each other has carried the transaction pertaining to 8 Bigas of land. [2025:RJ-JP:18926] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2305/2025] Investigating Officer, present in Court, has submitted that CCTV footage gathered/collected during investigation reveals the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence/crime. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the fact that disputed questions of facts are involved in the instant matter, that matter requires investigation, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the present petition. Howsoever, Investigating Authority is directed to conduct investigation in FIR No. 125/2025 in a fair and impartial manner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /176