SMT.RAJKALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5048/2025 · 2025-08-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159883 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159883 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5048 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Anita Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - The District Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, to decide Case No. 181 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. D202302570000181) - Smt. Rajkali Vs. State of U.P., U/S 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - The District Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - The District Collector/Chief Revenue Officer, Tehsil - Lalganj, District - Pratapgarh, is directed to decide Case No. 181 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. D202302570000181) - Smt. Rajkali Vs. State of U.P., U/S 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anita Tiwari, Simi Jha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt.Rajkali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench