Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15988 (AP)

T.Srikanth, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13336/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010204262020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13336/2020 Between: 1. T.SRIKANTH,, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGE 34 YEAR OCC CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. DOOR NO.39-18-63/9, SF-2, MOTHER ENCLAVE, MADHAVADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT , VELAGAPUDI , AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 530001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADHAVADARA, MURALINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 530007 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AIR PORT POLICE STATION, MADHAVADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 530007 5. SMT SUNITHA, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AIR PORT POLICE STATION, MADHAVADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 530007 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 having received the complainant dt 3-6-2020 from the petitioner and not registering the crime to initiate action against the respondents No.4 and 5 is illegal, arbitrary and also contrary to the provisions of 154 to 157 Cr.PC., and also violation of Art.21 and 23 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to register a crime against the respondents No. 4 and 5 basing on the complaint dated 03-06-2020 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to register a crime against the respondents No. 4 and 5 basing on the complaint dated 03-06-2020, pending disposal of the writ petition , and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13336 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos.2 and 3 having received the complainant dt.3.6.2020 from the petitioner and not registering the crime to initiate action against the respondents No.4 and 5 is illegal arbitrary and also contrary to the provisions of 154 to 157 Cr.P.C and also violation of Art 21 and 23 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents Nos.2 and 3 to register a crime against the respondents Nos.4 and 5 basing on the complaint dated 03.06.2020 and to pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed a private complaint and pursuing the matter before the trial Court. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS