Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159865 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY v. GAMINI SINGLA, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, AMETHI

CAPL/3720/2024 · 2025-02-06

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7782 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3720 of 2024 Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- Gamini Singla, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amethi Counsel for Applicant :- Satya Prakash Mishra,Satya Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. 3. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 29.05.2023, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 2848 of 2023. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- "Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1-Sub-Divisional OfÏcer, Baldirai, District-Sultanpur to consider and decide Case No.T202204680901361, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of one year from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Authority concerned, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. Petitioner is directed to file an afÏdavit of undertaking before the Authority concerned that he would appear on each date fixed in the case and will not take any adjournment before the Authority concerned. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. " 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel, on the basis of instructions has submitted that the proceedings under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided by order dated 24.10.2024, the same has been produced during the course of argument, which is taken on record, hence, the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. 5. After going through records of the case, it is found that the judgment and order dated 29.05.2023, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 2848 of 2023 has been complied with. 6. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 6.2.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench