Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159855 (ALL)

DEVI RAM (DECEASED) THRU. LEGAL HEIR AJAY KUMAR SAINI v. BOARD OF REVENUE THRU. CHAIRMAN, U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5015/2025 · 2025-08-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5015 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to decide Revision No. 1829 of 2008-09 (Computerized Case No. R200902070037285) - Sita Ram and Others Vs. Fatte and Others, U/S 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, is directed to decide Revision No. 1829 of 2008-09 (Computerized Case No. R200902070037285) - Sita Ram and Others Vs. Fatte and Others, U/S 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Deepansi, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Devi Ram (Deceased) Thru. Legal Heir Ajay Kumar Saini .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Thru. Chairman, U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench