Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159847 (ALL)

RAM PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

/8263/2024 · 2025-08-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8263 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Pratap Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Saryu Prasad Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri S.P. Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no. 6. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an interlocutory order dated 02.09.2024 passed by respondent no.2 in Suit No.1683 of 2024, whereby the application of respondent no.6 for being impleaded as a party respondent was allowed. It is informed that the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code have already been concluded. As such, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Pankaj Bhatia, J) Order Date :- 5.8.2025 A.Dewal Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench