Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159844 (MAD)

Sellamuthu v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP(MD)/14442/2025 · 2025-09-02

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14442 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14442 of 2025 Sellamuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Trichy District. 4.Selvaraj 5.Thangavel 6.Rajendiran ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent No.3 and their officials not to interfere in the civil dispute on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2025. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14442 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondent Police not to interfere in a civil dispute based on his representation dated 23.08.2025. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the third respondent is interfering in a land dispute between the petitioner and his relatives, namely, the respondents 4 to 6. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the according to the complainant, the petitioner had sold a property, which jointly belonged to him and the private respondents. He would further submit that an enquiry would be conducted and a decision would be taken within a period of two (2) weeks from today. 4. Since an enquiry is pending, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. However, the petitioner cannot be called under the guise of enquiry repeatedly. Therefore, the respondent Police shall conduct the enquiry 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14442 of 2025 within a period of two (2) weeks from today and inform the result of the enquiry to the petitioner and the complainant therein. 5. With the above observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 02.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (DCB), Trichy District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14442 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. Lm Crl.O.P(MD).No.14442 of 2025 02.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis