Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159843 (ALL)

DEVANSHU KUMAR (CONSTABLE PERSONNEL NO. 192242631) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9513/2025 · 2025-08-26

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9513 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for transfer from District Etawah to District Meerut on compassionate ground and couple posting since his wife who is also employed in the same Department is currently posted in District Meerut. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. August 26, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Devanshu Kumar (Constable Personnel No. 192242631) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench