PANKAJ PANDEY @ PANKAJ KUMAR v. CIVIL JUDGE MALIHABAD (SENIOR DIVISION) LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
A227/5232/2025 · 2025-09-02
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159837 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159837 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5232 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Suit bearing No.516/2010, filed by the opposite party No.2 for permanent injunction on 22.07.2010, pending before learned Civil Judge, Malihabad (Senior Division), Lucknow.
3. It is submitted that although a large number of dates have been fixed, for reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served by keeping the aforesaid petition pending. Rather, the ends of justice can be served by directing the court concerned to consider and decide the Suit bearing No.516/2010, most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably as expeditiously as possible.
5. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. September 2, 2025 Shubhankar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Jaspreet Singh,J.) Pankaj Pandey @ Pankaj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Malihabad (Senior Division) Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench