HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5837 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that he does not wish to press the instant petition as certain parties have incorrectly been impleaded and certain facts have been incorrectly mentioned, hence, in order to rectify the array of parties as well as pleadings, he submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh. Sri Mohd. Azam Khan learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.4 on caveat. He submits that he has no objection to the aforesaid request. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed, however, it is further provided whenever the petitioner files the fresh petition he shall serve a copy of the same on Sri Mohd. Azam Khan learned counsel for the respondent. In case, if the petitioner moves an application for return of certified copies, the office shall do the needful. September 24, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navneet Kumar Srivastava, Ved Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohd. Azam Khan (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Keshavpati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench