Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159797 (ALL)

RAMBUJH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. COOPERATIVE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9608/2025 · 2025-08-26

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9608 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed seeking issuance of a direction to the Authorities concerned for making payment of regular pension to the petitioner along with the arrears of interest and direction to the State Government to ensure sufficient funds to the Authority concerned for payment of regular pension along with arrears. 3. It is submitted that by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner, who was earlier working on the post of Kurk Amin, superannuated from service on 30.06.2013 but in view of paucity of funds in the Corporation, he was not being paid regular pension. It is further submitted that the pension of petitioner is a vested right and not a bounty to be disbursed at the sweet will of employer, and thereafore, the aspect of paucity of funds cannot be a ground for denying pension to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3, i.e., Commissioner and Registrar, Cooperative U.P., Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, within a period of four weeks from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shikha Srivastava, Shobhit Kumar Rastogi, Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rambujh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Cooperative Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that the representation of petitioner shall not be rejected on the ground that the department does not have sufficient funds. In case, petitioner is found entitled for pension, actual payment of arrears shall be ensured within 6 weeks, thereafter, respondent shall also therefore ensure regular payment of pension. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is hereby disposed of. August 26, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 9608 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench