ARVIND v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/7991/2025 · 2025-08-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7991 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Jiyauddeen, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Diwaker Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.368 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87 of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Dhaurahara, District- Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 06.06.2025 against two persons, including the applicant, stating that the accused persons had enticed away the informant's daughter and niece, both of whom are minor. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. In the statement of the victims recorded by the Investigating Officer, they stated that they had gone away with the accused persons for working and earning and upon coming to know about the FIR, they came back. Both of them stated that no misdeed was committed against them. 6. Similar statements were given by victims before the Magistrate also. 7. After investigation, a charge-sheet has been submitted on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jiyauddeen, Anand Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arvind .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
08.07.2025. 8. Co-accused- Ram Lakhan @ Motu has been granted bail by means of an order dated 22.07.2025 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.6686 of 2025. 9. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application and he has submitted that allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has been submitted. 10. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the statements of the victim coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 18.06.2025 whereas the investigation stands concluded and another co-accused has already been granted bail, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 11.
11. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 12. Let the applicant- Arvind be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. August 26, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 7991 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench