HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9517 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Sri I.P. Singh, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 2. No notice be issued to respondents no.4 and 5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 4. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 13.06.2025 and 28.06.2025, copies of which are Annexures 1 and 2 to the petition. 5. Initially vide order dated 13.06.2025 the petitioner had been transferred from Saharanpur to Agra. Vide order dated 28.06.2025, he has been transferred from Agra to Lucknow as Executive Engineer. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned orders. However, the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance. 7. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation against the impugned transfer orders dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor Ravi Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 13.06.2025 and 28.06.2025 before respondent no. 2 within a period of three days from today. 8. In case such a representation is made, respondent no. 2 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith certified copy of this order. 9. Till disposal of representation no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer orders. 10. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. August 28, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9517 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench