RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.
BAIL/7907/2025 · 2025-09-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159782 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7907 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Nakul Sharma, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Shikha Sinha, learned Additional Government Advocate-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 505 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 316(5) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 16.10.2024 against a solitary named accused person Dushyant Shukla, Manager of Yash Bharti Gramin Agro Producer Company Limited stating that the named accused was running a daily deposit scheme for the aforesaid company for the past several years and he suddenly ran away after selling away his car. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case merely because he happened to be Director of the Company and he has no criminal history. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that the co-accused Ram Bahadur Maurya has already been granted bail by this court by means of an order dated 11.09.2025, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8555 of 2025. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 17.04.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nakul Sharma, Ram Sajiwan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 09.02.2025 and the investigation already stands concluded and co-accused Ram Bahadur Maurya has been granted bail by this court and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant-Ravi Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 15, 2025 Ram. BAIL No. 7907 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench