Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159767 (ALL)

YOGENDRA SINGH @ JOGENDRA SINGH v. BHARAT BHARGAV, S.D.M., GONDA

CAPL/3704/2024 · 2025-02-06

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7781 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3704 of 2024 Applicant :- Yogendra Singh @ Jogendra Singh Opposite Party :- Bharat Bhargav, S.D.M., Gonda Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari,Dharmendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. 3. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 23.01.2024, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 302 of 2024. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- "Considering the fact that application in issue i.e. application dated 31.07.2023, instituted in terms of order dated 01.07.2023 passed by Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda, is pending before Sub Divisional OfÏcer, Colonel Ganj, Gonda, since July 2023, the present petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.2 to consider and decide the pending application in issue, indicated in the prayer clause, most expeditiously, as per law, preferably within a period of four months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of." 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel, on the basis of instructions received from the respondent i.e. Shri Bharat Bhargav, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonel Ganj, Gonda, has submitted that the proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided by order dated 25.09.2024, hence, the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with. The copy of the order dated 25.09.2024, which has been produced during the course of argument, is taken on record. 5. After going through records of the case, it is found that the judgment and order dated 23.01.2024, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 302 of 2024 has been complied with. 6. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 6.2.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench