Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15976 (PAT)

Jahnawi Kumar Singh @ Gopal Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/12383/2016 · 2025-07-28

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12383 of 2016 ====================================================== Jahnawi Kumar Singh @ Gopal Singh S/o Ragho Singh R/o vill. Anua P.S. Karpi in the District of Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Sub divisional Magistrate, Arwal 3. The deputy collector land reforms , Arwal 4. The Circle Officer, Sonbhadra, Vansi Suryapur, Arwal 5. The O.P. In Charge, Vansi O.P. Under Karpi Police Station, Arwal ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gp22-Sushil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) to direct the respondent authority to provide agricultural produce or its cost on current rate to the petitioner for the period of 26/11/2002 to 26/12/2009 with respect to his agricultural land measuring area 38 Acre which was attached under 146 Cr.P.C. under the order dated 26/11/2002 passed by learned sub Divisional Magistrate, Arwal in case No. 865 of 2000 with 10% panel Patna High Court CWJC No.12383 of 2016(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 interest upon it; (ii) also for any other relief/relieves for which petitioner is entitled in the eye of law. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he shall be approaching the Collector, Arwal in next four weeks. 4. Learned State counsel submits that if such petition is preferred within four weeks, the same be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation. 6. It is made clear that if the order comes in favour of the petitioner, shall be entitled to the corollary benefits. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U