M/S BEE KAY ENTERPRISE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
WP(C)/4631/2020 · 2025-05-29
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15976 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15976 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010153812020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4631/2020 M/S BEE KAY ENTERPRISE HAVING H.O. AT GROUND FLOOR, AVATAR COMPLEX, NAHARANI PATH, BASISTHA ROAD, DISPUR, GHY-6, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR- SRI BASANTA KALITA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O- LT. HITESWAR KALITA, R/O- KRISHNA PLAZA, BONPHUL NAGAR PATH, LAST GATE, DISPUR, GHY-6 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PWD, DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) CHANDMARI GHY-3 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) JORHAT ROAD CIRCLE JORHAT-1 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD TEOK AND MARIANI TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION TEOK 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD JORHAT TITABOR AND DERGAON TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION JORHAT-7
Page No.# 2/2 6:THE TREASURY OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DY. COMMISSIONER JORHA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y DOLOI, MR. S Z RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, PWD, SC, FINANCE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 30.05.2025 Shri SZ Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the subject matter involve has become infructuous. Also heard Shri B. Gogoi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam for the respondents. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant