REKHA RANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CO-OPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/9480/2025 · 2025-08-25
Manish Mathur
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159758 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9480 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Parties to treat the husband of Petitioner a Government Servant and pay arrears of salary and all service benefits and post retiral dues including pension etc. from his initial date of appointment and the other benefits may also be provided to the Petitioners from time to time as has been given to the other Kurk Amins, in the interest of Justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Parties to decide the case of husband of Petitioner in terms of judgement and order dated 25.11.2008 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 7326 (S/S) of 2004; Chandra Prakash Pandey and others Versus State of U.P. and others, which has been affirmed in Special Appeal no. 187 of 2009; State of U.P. Versus Chandra Prakash Pandey and others vide order dated 19.11.2010 as well as by Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 10.01.2017 in Civil Appeal no. 312 of 2017; State of U.P. Versus Chandra Prakash Pandey etc., in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rekha Rani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co-Operative Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
produced before the said authority, in the light of the aforesaid judgment, if the same is applicable to the petitioner. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 25, 2025 Satish WRIA No. 9480 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench