Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159742 (ALL)

SHIVA NAND YADAV AND 25 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9574/2025 · 2025-08-26

Manish Mathur

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9574 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State counsel for opposite party No.1, Mr. Ranvijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties 3 and 4. 2. Petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: " a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the opp. parties to pay the salary to the petitioners for the post of Head Master/Headmistress and also to pay the arrears in light of the judgement passed in Special Appeal bearing no.652/SLP/2024 Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board & Ors. vs. Tripurari Dubey & Ors. in the interest of justice. b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding and directing the opposite parties to decide the representation dated 05.08.2025 of the petitioners in the light of the judgment in Special Appeal bearing no.652/SLP/2024 Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board & Ors. vs. Tripurari Dubey & Ors. within a stipulated time contained in Annexure No.4 to this writ petition." 3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, District Gonda which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the concerned authority in the light of judgement relied upon the petitioners in case the same is applicable. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Kumar Pandey, Hairdaya Narain Tiwari, Hari Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh, Uday Veer Singh Shiva Nand Yadav And 25 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 26, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 9574 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench