Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15974 (RAJ)

KUNAL LADDHA S/O SH. OM PRAKASH LADDHA v. INCOME TAX OFFICER

CW/6997/2023 · 2025-04-04

Anand Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15320-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6997/2023 Kunal Laddha S/o Sh. Om Prakash Laddha, Aged About 40 Years, R/o D-184, Akshat Residency, Bhrigu Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur - 302016 (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 4 (1), Jaipur, New Central Rev- enue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur - 302005 (Raj.) 2. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Jaipur, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-Ii, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna Advocate Mr. Sarvesh Jain Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/04/2025 1. Heard. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that present is not a case to entertain the petition particu- larly when there exists an alternative remedy against the order of assessment. 3. Considering the same, this petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal against the order of assessment. 4. Considering that this petition has remained pending and during the pendency of the petition, stay against the assessment [2025:RJ-JP:15320-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6997/2023] order was passed, it is directed that in case the appeal is preferred within the period of 30 days from today, the appeal shall be de- cided on its own merits without taking any objection with regard to limitation. All the questions raised in this petition shall be open and available to be raised in the appeal by the petitioner. (ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ Sanjay Kumawat/Daksh-26