Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159737 (ALL)

AMARAWATI v. SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR

CAPL/3701/2024 · 2025-02-06

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7766 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3701 of 2024 Applicant :- Amarawati Opposite Party :- Shri Santosh Kumar, Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Om Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. Neither learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on her behalf. 3. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 07.02.2024, passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 577 of 2024. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- "Accordingly the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.-2 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No. T202204040204473 (Amrawati Versus Shyam Lal), most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of." 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent has submitted that the compliance afÏdavit has been filed on 08.01.2025, enclosing therein the copy of the order dated 28.10.2024 passed in the proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P Revenue Code, 2006 (hereinafter referred as Code, 2006). 5. It is further submitted that till date, no objection has been filed by learned counsel for the applicant against the same. 6. After going through records of the case, it is found that the judgment and order passed by the writ court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 577 of 2024has been complied with as the order dated 28.10.2024 has been passed in the proceedings pending under Section 34 of the Code, 2006. 7. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 6.2.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench