RAM SHUKLA THRU. HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MANMOHAN PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/8167/2025 · 2025-09-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159711 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159711 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8167 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that, the petitioner had applied for supply of the copies of the answer book for the written examination of the petition for the Session 2024-25, the requisite application was moved under RTI Act and the requisite fees was also paid.
3. In response to the said, this Court had directed the counsel for the respondent to produce copy of the answer sheets, the same have been produced before this Court, the Standing Counsel is directed to supply a photocopy of the answer sheets to the counsel for the petitioner during course of the day.
4. In view of the answer sheets will supply to the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. September 3, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Shukla Thru. His Father And Natural Guardian Manmohan Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Madhyamik Shiksha Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench