PAVAN KUMAR CHATURVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/9491/2025 · 2025-08-25
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9491 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 2, Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and Shri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 to 6. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being decided The petitioner aggrieved with the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, whereby the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled with effect from the date of his appointment. Various grounds have been raised by learned counsel for the petitioner for challenging the order impugned. However Shri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 to 6 states on the basis of oral instructions given by District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Shravasti that the
order impugned has been passed after disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,1999 by means of chargesheet dated 01.06.2024 and 29.03.2025. Shri Kumar Ayush states that the respondents intend to withdraw the chargesheets dated 01.06.2024 and 29.03.2025 but with liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law on account of having Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyanshu Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush, Ran Vijay Singh Pavan Kumar Chaturvedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
secured appointment by committing forgery. Considering the aforesaid as well as the statement of Shri Kumar Ayush,
learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 6 that chargesheet dated 01.06.2024 and 29.03.2025 would be withdrawn, the writ petition is allowed. The order impugned dated 17.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, is set aside with liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. August 25, 2025 J. K. Dinkar WRIA No. 9491 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench