HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7136 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 28.01.2025 passed by the CJM, Sultanpur in of criminal case no. 301/2025 "State vs. Pankaj Maurya and others under section 452, 308, 323. Sultanpur, 504, 506, 427, 34, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District which relates to the petitioners, in the interest of justice. It is further prayed, that this Hon'ble Court may also kindly be pleased to stay the further proceeding of criminal case no. 301/ 2025 "State vs. Pankaj Maurya and others under section 452, 308, 323, 504, 506, 427, 34, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur,impugned order dated 28.01.2025 passed by the CJM, Sultanpurwhich relates to the petitioners, to secure the ends of justice during the pendency of this petition. " 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra, Anjali Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Ram Sadan @ Madan 9 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. August 28, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7136 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench