MOHD. FIROJ AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/7845/2025 · 2025-08-28
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7845 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard, Shri Sunil Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed with following prayers:
"i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the investigating agency i.e. Respondent No. 1 to 3 to conduct fair, proper, impartial and expeditious investigation in first information report dated 29-07-2025 bearing FIR No. 0434/2025 U/s 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, 2023 lodged at P. S. Thakurganj, District Lucknow West (Commissionerate Lucknow) lodged by the petitioner no. 1. A true type/photocopy of impugned F.I.R. has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the petition.
ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass or arrest the petitioners in aforesaid FIR.
iii) To issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case.
iv) To allow the writ petition with costs."
3. The petitioner wants fair and prompt investigation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Firoj And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations as the investigation is still pending, let the petitioner approach the Superintendent of Police, Gonda, raising his grievance, who shall get the matter inquired and ensure fair and prompt investigation. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved that is in spite of the aforesaid, he may approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate concerned in this regard in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others;
(2008) 2 SCC 409.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of. August 28, 2025 Haseen U.
CRLP No. 7845 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench