DINESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FINANCE LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8164/2025 · 2025-08-26
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159699 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159699 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8164 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner says that there is typographical error in the Prayer clause regarding Registration number of his vehicle which has been incorrectly typed.
2. We allow the counsel for the petitioner to make necessary correction in the prayer clause during the course of the day.
3. Let necessary correction be carried out today itself.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State- respondent no.1 and Shri Sanjeev Singh, who appears on behalf of the Opposite party nos.2 to 5.
5. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following main prayers:-
"i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to opposite parties not to adopt coercive measures in realization of due amount and accept the same in easy installments and the opposite parties may be directed not to create disturbance in peaceful possession of petitioner over the vehicle of petitioner having registration No.U.P.42-CT-7274. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjeev Singh Dinesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
ii) Issue any other writ order or direction in the nature and manner which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and just in the circumstances of the case. iii) Allow the writ petition with cost in favour of the petitioner."
6. The relief that is claimed by the petitioner is against the ICICI Bank, which is a private Bank. No writ petition is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum. August 26, 2025 N.PAL WRIC No. 8164 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench