HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8429 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Standing Counsel for the State. The instructions are taken on record. The present petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 11.07.2025, wherein, the petitioner was asked to give a reply as to why the lease of fisheries may not be cancelled and the amount may not be doubled as arrears of land revenue. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instruction states that only notice has been issued and no final order has been passed yet. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file reply to the notice. In case any fresh orders are passed, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court. September 3, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kr. Sharma, Arshad Hafeez Khan, Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Maya Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench