RAM ROOP AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/6967/2025 · 2025-08-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6967 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 02.12.2023 and the order of cognizance and summoning order dated 29.07.2024 passed by/pending in the court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.18, Sultanpur in Crl. Case No.1857/2025 "State Vs. Rajan & others" vide Case Crime No.315/2023, Under Section 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, Police Station Motigarpur, District Sultanpur and further proceedings of the case passed in pursuance thereof."
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Roop And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
7. The application is disposed off accordingly. August 26, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 6967 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench