( 2025:JHHC:16670 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4696 of 2025 ------ 1. Shahid Ansari, aged about 28 years, son of Murtaj Ansari, resident of Village-Kuti, P.O.-Ramkanda, P.S.-Ramkanda, Dist.-Garhwa (Jharkhand) 2. Ashok Singh, aged about 28 years, son of Bhola Singh, resident of Village-Nauka, P.O.-Bhandaria, P.S.-Bhandaria, Dist.-Garhwa (Jharkhand) … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. S.T. Sajid, Advocate : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.42 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303(2)/308(3)/308(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of extremist organization TSPC and were demanding extortion from the crusher mine and plant of the informant and committed theft of mobile phone of the site in-charge of the said informant company; besides pamphlets the petitioner no.1 and further the petitioner, led to discovery of one .315 bore fire arm, one toy gun, two t-shirts and three camouflage shirts and on being disclosed by petitioner no.2, two mobile phones with four different sim cards and pamphlets mentioning TSPC Area Commander Pankaj Jee as pasted in and around mines-crusher site, has been recovered. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioners were not put on T.I. Parade. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 29.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 17.06.2025 in B.A. No.4682 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be also admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Garhwa, in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.42 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/