DR. KAMLESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES UDYOG BHAWAN NEW DELHI AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/8219/2025 · 2025-08-28
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8219 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Varun Pandey who appears on behalf of of the Opposite party no.1, Union of India.
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for the following main prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 22.05.2025, contained in Annexure No.1 as well as entire consequential action alongwith the issue of fresh letter of intent to any other person by the company after summoning the same from its custodian. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to restrain the fresh incumbment to run the business of Sale of Tata Motors in the territory of District-Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other order, or direction, which this court deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of Petitioners be passed in the interest of justice. (iv) Allow the writ petition with cost in favour of the Petitioners." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Upadhyay, Amrish Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Dr. Kamlesh Chandra Tripathi And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Heavy Industries Udyog Bhawan New Delhi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. We have noticed that the counsel for the petitioners has arrayed the Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Heavy Industries Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi, as Opposite party no.1 and Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd. through and its Assigns /Employees as Opposite party no.2.
4. A writ petition for the prayers, as claimed, is not maintainable.
5. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as such with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate Forum. August 28, 2025 N.PAL WRIC No. 8219 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench