HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9686 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashwani Kumar Singh, learned counsel, who files Memo on behalf of respondent no.1, and Sri Rajesh Tewari, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 to 4. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties the matter is being decided finally. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the prayer (I). 4. The statement is recorded. The writ petition is dismissed so far as it pertains to prayer (I). 5. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the respondents having initiated the departmental proceedings by means of the charge sheet dated 27.06.2023 and a period of more than two years having lapsed the said disciplinary proceedings have still not been concluded till date. He also states that the inquiry report has already been submitted on 30.04.2024. 6. Sri Rajesh Tewari, learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4, states that an endeavour would be made to conclude the disciplinary proceedings and to pass a final order in accordance with law and relevant rules which order would be passed within a period of two months. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nilaya Gupta, Ajay Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Rajesh Tewari Gurvinder Singh .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Higher Education Ministry Of Education New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. The aforesaid statement of Sri Tewari is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. August 27, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9686 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench