RAHUL PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL.CHIEF SECY/ PRIN. SECY.. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9526/2025 · 2025-08-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159592 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159592 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9526 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 to 3 and Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5.
2. Admittedly against the impugned punishment order dated 12.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the appellate authority.
3. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of two weeks from today.
4. In case such an appeal is filed. the appellate authority shall proceed to decide the same on merits in accordance with law and relevant rules which appeal would be decided within a further period of six weeks from the date the said appeal is filed. August 28, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Yadav (Abdul Moin,J.) Rahul Prajapati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy/ Prin. Secy.. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench