Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159558 (ALL)

DESHRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. LOK NIRMAN VIBHAG LKO AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9520/2025 · 2025-08-28

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9520 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for re-engaging petitioner in service as a daily wage employee in terms of letter dated 08.07.2010. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that earlier as well petitioner had filed Writ Petition No.749 (S/S) of of 2011 seeking the same benefit but while dismissing the said petition vide judgment and order dated 11.02.2011, it was kept open for the Department to consider and decide re-engagement of petitioner. It is submitted that aforesaid aspect was kept open while dismissing Special Appeal No.184 of 2011vide order dated 15.03.2011. 4. It is therefore submitted that despite observations of this Court as noted herein above, the opposite parties have not yet passed any order for re-engagement of petitioner. 5. With regard to aforesaid grievance, petitioner is said to have submitted a representation dated 14.06.2025 before authority concerned. 6. Learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer for decision on representation of petitioner. 7. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits of the case, opposite party no.2, i.e. Engineer-in-Chief, Vyasthapan 'ga' Varg, Lok Nirman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Karan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Deshraj Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Lok Nirman Vibhag Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Vibhag, Nirman Bhawan, Lucknow or any other competent authority is directed to consider and decide representation dated 14.06.2025 preferred by petitioner expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with copy of said representation is produced before the authority concerned. 8. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. August 28, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 9520 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench