SALIKRAM MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/8190/2025 · 2025-08-26
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159543 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8190 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with following main prayers:-
"i) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing to quash the impugned notice dated 16-12-2024, which is a mistakenly averred in the notice as 16-12-2025, U/S-67(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, issued by opposite party no. 3 i.e. Assistant Collector/Tehsildar Tehsil-Alapur, District-Ambedkar Nagar, which is contained as Annexure No. 2 to this writ petition. ii) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties specially opposite party no. 2 & 3 to not initiate demolition proceeding against the petitioner on the basis of the false and arbitrary evidence regarding Gata No. 397/3 village Sipah, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar measuring area 0.0132 hectare, out of which the petitioner old house is constructed having area 0.103 hectare, in the interest of justice. iii) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties specially opposite party no.2 & 3 to not demolished the house of the petitioner situated at Gata No. 397/3 village Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Salikram Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Sipah, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar measuring area 0.0132 hectare, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the State-respondents has pointed out that the petitioner has challenged the show cause notice, which has been issued on
16.12.2024. Admittedly, the petitioner has not submitted any reply to the same. 4.
This petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit his reply to the show cause notice dated 16.12.2024 within a period of one week from today, annexing therewith all documentary evidence and in case no final order has been passed in pursuance of show cause notice dated 16.12.2024 by the competent authority, let final order be passed only after consideration of reply of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with reply is submitted by the petitioner before the authority concerned. August 26, 2025 Sachin WRIC No. 8190 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench