HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8311 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Daya Shankar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 3 and Shri Nripendra Mishra, Advocate, who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no. 5 to 9 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondents No. 2 and 3 to do not measure the land Gata No.826 of the petitioner during pendency of the Revision No.R20230815002924 (Ram Naresh Maurya & others vs. Smt. Madhuri Devi @ Rajni & others,) which is pending before the Board of Revenue, Lucknow. 4. It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a revision before the Board of Revenue assailing the order dated 29.01.2016 passed by the Additional Collector / Chief Revenue Officer. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that in the said revision the next date fixed is 17.04.2026 while the petitioner has moved an application for interim relief and no order has been passed thereon and submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case his application for interim relief is considered expeditiously Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Naresh Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Counsel for the respondent does not object to the prayer aforesaid. 6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider and decide the application filed along with the Revision No.R20230815002924 (Ram Naresh Maurya & others vs. Smt. Madhuri Devi @ Rajni & others,) within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. . . September 10, 2025 KR WRIC No. 8311 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench