HAKEEB AHMAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5032/2025 · 2025-08-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159533 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159533 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5032 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ajay Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Colonelganj, District - Gonda, to decide Case No. 14617 of 2024 - Hakeeb Ahmad Khan Vs. Azad Khan, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Colonelganj, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil - Colonelganj, District - Gonda , is directed to decide Case No. 14617 of 2024 - Hakeeb Ahmad Khan Vs. Azad Khan, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Shukla, Rohit Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Hakeeb Ahmad Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench