Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25195 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7995 of 2024 Petitioner :- M/S Sifal Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory Sri Rajesh Sisodia Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Infra. And Industrial Development Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Aahuti Agarwal,Abhishek Khare,Saumya,Sudeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Waseeq Uddin Ahmed Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The parties agree that the matter is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 16.12.2024 passed in Writ Petition being Matters Under Article 227 No.5869 of 2024 (U.G. Infrastructure Private Ltd. Delhi Thru. Director Sri Arvind Singh Rathore v. State of U.P. & Ors.). 3. In view thereof, present petition stands disposed off on the same reasoning as contained in the order dated 16.12.2024, in the following terms: 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 and perused the material available on record. 5. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 15.07.2024 passed by the revisional authority in exercise of powers under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 read with Section 12 of the U.P. Industrial Development Act., 1976. 6. While challenging the said order, the counsel for the petitioner stated that almost in similar circumstances, different orders were passed in respect of two different persons, who are similarly situated as per him. 7. While addressing the issue on merits, all the parties, who are present here agreed that the matter may be remanded to the revisional authority, which is manned by a person different from the authority which has passed the order impugned. 8. In view of the agreement of the parties, the matter is remanded back for consideration afresh. The present petition is disposed of quashing the order dated 15.07.2024 and remanding the matter before the revisional authority to decide the revision afresh and in accordance with law. The petitioner would be at liberty to place any orders of which, the petitioner seeks precedential value, the revisional authority shall consider the arguments of the petitioner as well as the precedents cited by the petitioner, if any, and shall pass a fresh order after hearing the parties within a period of six weeks. The revisional authority would not be bound by any observations made in the present order and would be entitled to consider all the pleas that may be raised by both the parties. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench