Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159511 (ALL)

MANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL) SECOND,LUCKNOW DIVISION, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5031/2025 · 2025-08-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5031 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow to decide interim relief application filed in Appeal No. C 202410000004835/ 2024 - Mandeep Singh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Lucknow Division, Lucknow, is directed to decide interim relief application filed in Appeal No. C 202410000004835/ 2024 - Mandeep Singh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date service report is received regarding service of notice upon opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Mandeep Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner (Judicial) Second,Lucknow Division, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench