JANKI DEVI v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, JUDICIAL AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/5088/2025 · 2025-08-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5088 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 to consider and pass appropriate order on the amendment application field by the petitioner before him strucking of the work "Mrityoouprant", from the order expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Additional Commissioner, Judicial Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to consider and pass appropriate order on the amendment application filed by the petitioner before him strucking of the work "Mrityoouprant", from the order, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Pratap Singh, Ayushi Dixit, Jyoti Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Janki Devi .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner, Judicial Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 28, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5088 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench