Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4333 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kripal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Sharan Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar Pandey,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "a. Issue a writ order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quash the orders dated 27.02.2023 and 29.09.2023 and the impugned recovery (Annexure No.1 and 3 to this writ petition. b. Issue a writ order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to dispossess to the petitioner and further be directed not to recover the amount towards damages against the petitioner." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner filed his objection to the said proceedings. He further contended that the order impugned has been passed without considering the objection filed by the petitioner and the order passed is a non-speaking and unreasoned order. Appeal filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed. 4. Matter requires consideration. 5. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 are represented by learned Standing Counsel. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appears for respondent No. 4. 6. Respondents may file counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. 7. List thereafter. 8. Till the next date of listing, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad