Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15950 (AP)

SHAIK LLIYAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10787/2025 · 2025-08-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010207482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10787/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK LLIYAS, S/O MOULANA, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC COOLIY , R/O.3-0, PATIBANDLA,PATIBANDLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL PALNADU- DISTRICT-522402. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS , PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPETA AND PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI AND PALNADU DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAKURAPADU, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th 2 respondent in failing to register the FIR complaint of the petitioner Dt. 01-04- 2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to provisions of B.N.S.S and also violation of principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 5th respondent to register the FIR against named accused in the complaint of the petitioner Dt 01-04-2025 as and to take up the investigation, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th respondent in failing to register the FIR complaint of the petitioner Dt. 01-04-2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to provisions of B.N.S.S and also violation of principles of natural justice and pass……” 2. Sri P. Mallikharjuna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.08.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 15 WRIT PETITION NO: 10787/2025 Dt.20.08.2025 MH