IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 368 of 2025 Date of decision : 8.7.2025. Surender Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus FC (Appeals) & others ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Baldev Negi, Addl. A.G., for respondents No. 1 and 3. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has though made a limited prayer in the instant petition, seeking direction against respondent No.1 to decide the matter expeditiously but at this stage, he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach respondent No.1 with similar prayer. 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty as aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 8th July, 2025. (kck) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?