HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4987 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Anurag Srivastava learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondents No.2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner prays for following relief: "(i) Direct the opposite party no.1 i.e. Recovery Officer-1, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow to decide the Recovery Proceedings pending under Section 19(22) of the Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act 1993 in case DRC No.589 of 2019 "State Bank of India v/s Pramod Tyagi", which is pending before him, within a stipulated time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court." Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending recovery proceedings as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 1, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prateek Shrivastava, Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Srivastava (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Pramod Tyagi .....Petitioner(s) Recovery Officer 1 Debts Recovery Tribunal Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench