Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159481 (ALL)

SABEENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/1038/2025 · 2025-08-26

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1038 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 23/06/2025 in criminal case no. 26272/2025 as well as impugned charge sheet no. 01/2025 dated 15/05/2025, as well as entire proceedings of criminal case no. 26272/2025 arising out of crime no. 1139/2024 under section 406,420, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District-Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that there is no evidence at all against the applicant and only on the basis of statement recorded by the police under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., the whole proceeding has been initiated and chargesheet has been filed. He added that the criminal proceedings against the present applicant is nothing but harassment. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the contention aforesaid and submits that there is no abuse of process of law and only factual matrix has been agitated before this Court and that could not be gone into at this stage, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and thus the application is liable to be dismissed. 5. After the argument at length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served, if this Court directs the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sabeena .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) below to permit the applicants to appear before the court below and file an application of discharge. He further submits that the court below may be directed to decide the discharge application within stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this Court. 6. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid submission. 7. In view of aforesaid, the applicant is permitted to file an application for discharge before the court below within a period of two weeks from today and if such an application is filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. August 26, 2025 Mayank NA528 No. 1038 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench