Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159480 (ALL)

ANKIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME SECTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8277/2025 · 2025-09-19

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8277 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None for the petitioner, whereas learned AGA for the State is present. 3. On the previous date also, learned counsel for the petitioners was not present, therefore, the case was directed to be listed in the next cause list. 4. This petition has been filed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners. 5. Even otherwise the petition is misconceived for the reason that learned AGA for the State, on the basis of instructions received from Shri Suresh Yadav, Sub-Inspector, Police Station-Phoolbehad, District Kheri, which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that no FIR is lodged against the petitioners and the petitioners are not being harassed by the police. 6. In view of above, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. September 19, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Ankit Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Sectt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench