PRADEEP KUMAR v. ARVIND SINHA, CHIEF MANAGER, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAG. DEPTT. IOB CENTRAL OFFICE CHENNAI AND ANOTHER
CAPL/3677/2024 · 2025-02-04
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7217 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3677 of 2024 Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Opposite Party :- Arvind Sinha, Chief Manager, Human Resources Manag. Deptt. Iob Central Office Chennai And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Kumar Misra Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Vinay Shanker, learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of Respondent No.1 and filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. The present contempt application has been preferred on 11.09.2024 for alleged non-compliance of judgement and order dated 5.6.2024 passed in Writ-A No.4674 of 2024, the relevant extract of the order is quoted hereinbelow:
"6. Taking into consideration the factual matrix of the case, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served to keep this writ petition pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Chief Manager, Human Resource Management Department / respondent no. 2 to take decision on the petitioner's representation by passing a detailed and reasoned
order and to consider the specific grounds and the request made therein.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not stayed the transfer order and it is provided that in case the petitioner reports its joining at the transferred place, his representation shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned within a period of three weeks from the date production of a detailed representation along with certified copy of this order before it." The representation of the applicant had already been decided on 3.7.2024 and the same was received by the applicant himself, the copy of the order dated 3.7.2024 deciding the representation of the applicant is taken on record and the photocopy of the same has been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he may permitted to take instruction from his client whether the order has been passed by Respondent No.1 or not. The order had already been passed by the Respondent No.1 - Arvind Sinha, Chief Manager, Human Resources Management Department, Indian Oversease Bank, Central Office, Chennai and the judgement and order passed by the writ court has been
complied with, hence, the present contempt application has become infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 4.2.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench