Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 159470 (ALL)

SHYAM CHANDRA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/870/2025 · 2025-08-28

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 870 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed stating that despite an order being passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, the same is not being executed. 3. The appropriate remedy of the petitioner to approach the authority by filing an application under Clause 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. In case, such an application is filed, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is disposed off. August 28, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manmohan Singh, Abhist Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shyam Chandra Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench