Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.899 of 2022 Decided on 13.05.2025 Vivek Sood ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents No.1 to 3/state. : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3/State submits that the trial of the petitioner has been concluded and he has been acquitted; therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 13th May, 2025 (Ravinder)